v1.0.2 reviewed the v1.0.1 unsafe-claim warnings. No text was rewritten because no warning was found to require correction after context review. The flagged language was evidence-gated, prohibition language, status vocabulary, or safe internal governance language.
None.
Warnings were left unchanged when they used no-claim, do-not-claim, evidence-required, unverified, blocked, planning-only, preparation-only, status vocabulary, schema, or audit language.
None identified by this cleanup pass.
2026-06-11T11:43:23Z
# Policy Language Cleanup ## Summary v1.0.2 reviewed the v1.0.1 unsafe-claim warnings. No text was rewritten because no warning was found to require correction after context review. The flagged language was evidence-gated, prohibition language, status vocabulary, or safe internal governance language. ## Unsafe language triage result - Total warnings reviewed: 94 - false_positive_evidence_gated: 1 - safe_as_written: 83 - schema_context_allowed: 10 ## Rewrites applied None. ## Warnings left unchanged and why Warnings were left unchanged when they used no-claim, do-not-claim, evidence-required, unverified, blocked, planning-only, preparation-only, status vocabulary, schema, or audit language. ## Human review needed None identified by this cleanup pass. ## Last updated 2026-06-11T11:43:23Z